A Proposal to Analyze
“A Government in Thrall to Religion” by Frank R Zindler
I don’t like his views one bit. I disagree on most of them and reading his background I see
absolutely no reason for some of the things that he says. Perhaps it is my religious bias, or
background that lead me to think and feel the way I do about Mr. Zindler, however I will say
that, though I disagree with most of it, I can or do agree with some of it. There are some points
he brings to light that I do believe our government has to realize and fix. Even though it is not
very appealing and convincing to me, it wasn’t me that Zindler was writing to. Considering that
his audience is primarily those of the Atheist party as he is I find that he is very persuasive in
stirring and intensifying the feelings of separation of church and state.
I propose to focus primarily how through his powerful word choice, religious connections,
and firm examples of his point he creates a very convincing pathological paper. It is not perfect
by any means or standards, however it accomplishes it’s purpose. That purpose is not to
persuade everyone to believe and think as he does(though I think he would like that), but it is to
help create stir amongst those who share his similar beliefs to creating a voice against the merge
of religion and state affairs. You can tell he had thought a great deal of the subject and also how
to word such an issue without completely ridiculing the religious. He is very firm on his
viewpoints and ways but does not spend the whole paper insulting those who not in favor of his
views. The greatest part of the paper is the passion that is displayed through his words. As you
read you have this sense of urgency as he repeatly tells his audience if we do not do this now,
when? Also banging off the same topic, he iterates the importance of such by letting people
know we will not survive as a nation if this keeps up. While I find fault in his views of the
importance of stopping religion being intertwined with government I will see both sides of his
argument, both from his original audience, and from myself.
No comments:
Post a Comment